ATO Q3 2025: $0.10 EPS Gain from Texas Bill, Ongoing Impact Unclear
- Regulatory Uplift: The confirmed $0.10 per share gain from Texas legislation (HB4385) represents tangible near-term value enhancement, reflecting the ability to pass on benefits to rates over one quarter, which could strengthen earnings.
- Normalized Throughput Environment: Management’s expectation for the through system business to revert to historical norms in fiscal '26 suggests improved operating margins and more predictable revenue streams as market conditions stabilize.
- Strong Financing Strategy: Robust operating cash flow combined with a balanced mix of equity and long-term debt financing supports continued growth without significant dilution risk, underpinning the company’s future expansion potential.
- Uncertain sustainability of Texas legislation benefits: The Q&A highlighted that the $0.10 uplift from Texas legislation reflects just one quarter’s impact, making it unclear how consistently this benefit will accrue over future periods.
- Timing uncertainties on asset placements: Executives noted that the impact of regulatory deferrals depends on when assets are placed in service, adding uncertainty to the timing of revenue recognition and future earnings.
- Ambiguity in through system and project dynamics: Questions regarding through system volumes and new project clarity (e.g., the Abilene data center project) suggest that future operating conditions and capital deployment remain uncertain.
| Metric | Period | Previous Guidance | Current Guidance | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EPS | FY 2025 | no prior guidance [N/A] | $7.35 to $7.45, revised from $7.20 to $7.30 | no prior guidance |
EPS Growth | FY 2026 | no prior guidance [N/A] | 6% to 8% annually | no prior guidance |
O&M Expenses | FY 2025 | no prior guidance [N/A] | $860 million to $880 million; fourth-quarter trend: $10M lower than prior year’s Q4 | no prior guidance |
Capital Spending | FY 2025 | no prior guidance [N/A] | Approximately $3.7 billion, with 86% dedicated to improving safety and reliability | no prior guidance |
Regulatory Outcomes | FY 2025 | no prior guidance [N/A] | $351 million annualized implemented and $229 million in progress; new rate filings for fiscal 2026 | no prior guidance |
Equity and Liquidity | FY 2025 | no prior guidance [N/A] | Approximately $5.5 billion in liquidity; includes $1.7 billion in net proceeds under forward sale agreements | no prior guidance |
| Topic | Previous Mentions | Current Period | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
Regulatory Environment Impact | Q1 2025 discussions focused on rate cases and cost recovery mechanisms and Q4 2024 emphasized routine rate filings and safety mechanisms. | Q3 2025 focused on the impact of Texas legislation (HB4384) increasing eligible capital spending and boosting EPS. | Shift toward a more favorable regulatory change in Q3 that builds on earlier rate case strategies. |
Sustainability | Q4 2024 highlighted robust sustainability initiatives with a $24 billion five‐year system modernization plan and strong customer satisfaction. | No specific sustainability initiatives were discussed in Q3 2025. | Sustainability, previously a noted focus, is now omitted in Q3. |
Lag Concerns | Q1 2025 addressed capital plan and rate lags to support gradual growth , while Q4 2024 mentioned operational lag issues such as incremental O&M adjustments. | Q3 2025 did not provide specific details on lag concerns. | Reduced emphasis in Q3 compared to previous periods. |
Financing Strategy and Capital Expenditure Investments with Dilution Risks | Q1 2025 and Q4 2024 detailed balanced equity and debt strategies, specific financing rounds, and detailed capital expenditure plans with dilution risk management. | Q3 2025 discussed a balanced mix of financing, reported $2.6 billion in capital spending with a focus on safety and reliability, and highlighted liquidity plans to cover equity needs. | Consistent focus across periods with Q3 emphasizing improved liquidity planning and continued balance to mitigate dilution. |
Customer Growth and Industrial Demand Dynamics | Q1 2025 noted over 59,000 new customers and details on industrial load from 11 new customers , and Q4 2024 reported nearly 60,000 new customers with additional industrial demand details. | Q3 2025 reported nearly 58,000 new residential, 575 new commercial, and 22 new industrial customers with a strong industrial load equivalent to about 67,000 residential customers. | Consistently robust growth with minor variations in customer segmentation and industrial demand reporting between periods. |
Throughput Operations and Asset Placement Timing Uncertainties | Q1 2025 mentioned a modest increase in APT through-system revenues and Q4 2024 reported a significant $39 million increase in throughput results under challenging market conditions. | Q3 2025 indicated throughput operations returning to historical norms and uniquely highlighted uncertainties in asset placement timing tied to Texas legislation. | While throughput operations remain consistent, Q3 introduces new uncertainty over asset placement timing. |
Project Execution and Large-Scale Customer Acquisition Ambiguities | Q1 2025 detailed specific project milestones (e.g. the 36-inch Line S-2 project, interconnect updates) and discussed industrial customer acquisition ambiguities while Q4 2024 provided extensive updates on system modernization and noted ambiguity on large-scale industrial projects. | Q3 2025 did not provide specific information on project execution or ambiguities in large-scale customer acquisitions, only referencing general customer growth. | Less detailed discussion in Q3 relative to proactive project execution commentary in earlier periods. |
Rising Operating Expenses and Compliance Cost Pressures | Q1 2025 reported a $41 million increase in O&M expenses driven by bad debt, employee, and compliance costs and Q4 2024 noted a $65 million O&M increase along with rising compliance spending and adjusted O&M growth assumptions. | Q3 2025 reported an $85 million increase in O&M expenses, with higher bad debt expense partly due to the absence of a prior nonrecurring reduction. | Expense pressures continue to rise, with Q3 showing a notably higher increase, reflecting ongoing cost challenges. |
Credit Risk and Potential Bad Debt Expense Increases | Q1 2025 highlighted a $15 million increase in bad debt expense and noted Moody’s negative outlook , while Q4 2024 discussed a one‑time benefit from regulatory changes and an expectation of normalized bad debt expense moving forward. | Q3 2025 mentioned higher bad debt expense as a factor in increased O&M costs, without additional commentary on credit ratings. | Continued concern over bad debt with earlier periods providing more context on credit risk; Q3 focuses solely on expense impact. |
-
Legislation Impact
Q: Is the $0.10 a quarter’s impact?
A: Management explained the $0.10 uplift reflects the impact of the Texas legislation effective June 20, 2025, covering one quarter of FY2025 rather than a half-year effect. -
Growth Financing
Q: Will strong cash flow reduce external equity?
A: They plan to finance growth with a balanced mix of equity and long-term debt, leveraging robust operating cash flow to support future investments. -
Through System Outlook
Q: What throughput levels are expected in 2025?
A: Management indicated that through system performance is projected to remain in line with FY2024 levels, with normalization anticipated as they move into FY2026. -
Annualization Clarification
Q: Should the $0.10 be annualized?
A: They clarified that simply annualizing the $0.10 is an oversimplification since the impact depends on when assets are placed in service. -
Abilene Project
Q: What is the capital outlay for the Abilene project?
A: Management refrained from providing specifics, noting details will emerge with signed contracts and clearer project timing. -
Tax Benefit Allocation
Q: How is the tax benefit split across segments?
A: They reported that roughly two-thirds of the benefit comes from the distribution side and one-third from APT in Q4.
Research analysts covering ATMOS ENERGY.